Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Q and A. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Q and A. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 20, 2021

Interview with Kate Moore, author of 'The Radium Girls' and 'The Woman They Could Not Silence'


Hello Darling Readers, 

It is my distinct pleasure and honour to give you an Author Q&A (haven't done one of these in a while!) - for someone I most admire, and whose books I am absolutely *obsessed* with. 

The one. The only. Kate Moore - author of The Radium Girls and The Woman They Could Not Silence


** 


Q: You've written fifteen books across various genres, so you've clearly developed a very good instinct for story in this industry. But what was it about your award-winning international bestseller, The Radium Girls, that felt different when you thought of it? Could you tell even at the point of the first burst of idea; that it would be a special one, and go off on the rocket-ship trajectory it did? 

I genuinely didn’t anticipate the reaction that The Radium Girls has received. What was different about this story from my other books, however, was the passion with which I pursued the project and, ultimately, with which I wrote the book. At the time I stumbled on the radium girls’ story – which I did through directing a play about them – I’d been a freelance editor and writer for about six months. I was busy ghostwriting other people’s memoirs – usually, these were stories of courageously fighting for justice, which actually parallels my interpretation of the radium girls’ experiences perfectly – and working on very commercial projects, such as cat books and humour titles. I had never written a history book before. But I felt driven to tell the women’s story and I think that passion marked it out as different for me, even though I didn’t necessarily anticipate its subsequent success. 


Q: I love Radium Girls *so much* - I have the hardback, paperback, and Young Reader's edition and have re-read it three times in three years. I adore it! So I've got to know; are there plans for it to be adapted? It's begging to be a Chernobyl-esque HBO series, if you ask me! 

Oh my goodness, thank you so much for your love for the women and their story! I can say that there is interest from Hollywood and things seem to be going well, but if I’ve learned anything about dramatic adaptations of books over the past few years, it’s that it takes forever for anything concrete to happen. So, I’m keeping my fingers crossed – but not holding my breath! All I can say is watch this space.

***

Q: How did you come across the muse and historic-figure for your next investigations and new book, Elizabeth Packard? When did you first 'meet' her? 

Finding Elizabeth’s story was a topsy-turvy situation because I found the topic I wanted to write about before I found my story’s actual heroine. The genesis of The Woman They Could Not Silence occurred in the fall of 2017, amid in the fire of the #MeToo movement. What struck me about that empowering time was not that women were speaking out, but that – finally – we were being listened to and, crucially, believed. It got me thinking about how women have been silenced and discredited in the past – namely, through the claim we’re crazy. And that’s what I wanted to write about – the medicalisation of female behaviour, and the way perfectly sane women are dismissed as mad simply for standing up for themselves. 

Having decided on the topic, I went searching for a story – because I am at heart a storyteller, even though I write non-fiction. I hoped to find a woman from history whose real-life experiences could showcase these issues, which still resonate today. I fell down a rabbit warren of internet searches about women and madness, and on 15 January 2018, in a University of Wisconsin essay that I found online, in a single paragraph four pages in, I first read about Elizabeth Packard. That first clue was enough for me to dig deeper, and once I realized how special Elizabeth was – how resilient, how fearless, how inspirational – and how dramatic her story, I knew she was “The One”: the woman I would write about next. 


Q: I can see strong themes and connections between The Radium Girls and The Woman They Could Not Silence - but I'd love to know for you personally, what tethers all your work in this nonfiction space? How would you categorise those threads? And are you constantly looking for new events and figures to keep exploring in your work? 

I agree there are lots of parallels! For me, it’s actually several elements. The most obvious would be inspiring women fighting for justice, the indisputable drama of their stories, and the forgotten nature of their achievements, but I think there are also parallels in the shocking science history, in gothic horror, and in the way these historic events still resonate today. I think what tethers a lot of my work is the idea of helping people silenced through injustice to have a voice again. And I am always looking for new events and figures to keep exploring in my work – though it’s easier said than done to find the right topic, especially given the intimate narratives I aspire to write, which are packed full of first-person accounts, so you can hear from the people at the heart of these stories themselves.

***

Q: How do you go about just ... beginning? Once you've hit on a topic (person or historic event) - what's your first point of order in researching and just *starting*? First port of call? 

The very first port of call is the internet, which is probably not surprising in this day and age. In the very early stages of a project, you not only want to know the bones of the story (at least as people currently understand them to be – sometimes deeper research reveals inaccuracies!) but also whether people have written on the topic before (sometimes, that can be the nail in the coffin if a narrative non-fiction account already exists). The second stage for me is always research, research, and yet more research. That means visiting special collections, libraries and museums, conducting interviews with key figures and their families, travelling to key locations, and reading other books on related topics (including scouring their bibliographies for yet more research inspiration…). For me, it’s essential to conduct all my research for a book before I write a single word of the manuscript. 

Q: I'm so interested in narrative nonfiction, and the way the form has been elevated in recent years - I'm curious to know as author and researcher, what are the "rules" of nonfiction that you stick to, and what have you enjoyed playing around with in a more artistic sense? (I know some nonfiction authors are constantly tackling the 'what were they thinking' problem in non-fiction; inferring what these "characters" based on real-people would have felt in a moment, etc.) 

I always aim to stay tethered to the facts as my sources show them to be. In terms of the “what were they thinking?” problem, I’ve been blessed that with both my history books to date, I had a wealth of first-person material to draw on, so I knew exactly what my “characters” were thinking and feeling as they left a record behind. There are of course always holes in research and sources where you don’t know exactly what happened. My solution in these situations is usually to make it clear to the reader that there is a question, but to plant seeds of what might have been so the reader still sees that situation in their mind’s eye. For example, when Elizabeth Packard confronts Dr. McFarland at one stage, she’s uncharacteristically coy in her account of the meeting about what actually happened at the climax of their impassioned discussion. In the book, I therefore wrote about this moment as follows: 


She observed with some surprise, “his feelings burst their confinement.”

Did he slam the table? Stand up with force? Grab at her elbows to shake her roughly? We do not know; she did not say. It could have been a glare or a grasp or a guttural roar: all we know is that, with strong feeling, he finally reacted to her words.

In terms of what I enjoy playing around with artistically, my love is storytelling, so I love two things in particular – 1/ creating and setting scenes based on extensive research – describing the click of Elizabeth’s boots on the stone steps of the asylum, for example, and the way that intimidating building is lit by the glow of gas-lights as she approaches it in the dusky twilight – and 2/ trying to prompt an emotional response in the reader to the real events I’m describing. 


Q: I imagine in both your books, hefty as they are!, there's still a lot that gets chucked out in the edits. So what are two facts or quirky findings you had in both Radium and Could Not Silence that you regret had to be cut? 

Oh, *so* much goes in the edits! I’m terrible for overdelivering and having to cut back afterwards. Hmm, two facts or quirky findings that had to go… For The Radium Girls, a fact from early on in the book that I had to cut was that, at that time, 75% of teenage girls worked for wages and they made up the majority of women in the workplace (older women tended to be married with children, and they therefore stayed in the home). You might also be interested to know that the Parisian laboratory in which the Curies discovered radium was so ramshackle it was described as “a cross between a horse stable and a potato cellar.” In The Woman They Could Not Silence, I had to cut a paragraph about the history of hydrotherapy (water therapy) to treat mental illness. “Patients were…blasted with high-powered hoses, wrapped in wet sheets, and submerged for hours in tubs of cold water,” I wrote of this historic treatment. “It was not a new therapy: one eighteenth-century doctor developed a treatment—conceived to treat wives who would not sleep with their husbands—in which the women were stripped, blindfolded and tied to a chair, before being showered for up to 90 minutes with incredible quantities of water (in one case, 15 tonnes).”



Q: Any helpful 'how-to' books, podcasts, Ted Talks etc. that you encountered and helped you in your creative process?

I’d highly recommend The Exploress podcast (which is actually an Australian podcast!), which takes you on a fully immersive time-travelling journey through women’s history. I found several of her pieces super helpful and fascinating. Visit www.theexploresspodcast.com


Q: What are you reading and loving right now?

I just finished historical novelist Marie Benedict’s latest book, Her Hidden Genius, which is about the scientist Rosalind Franklin. It’s due out in January 2022 and I think readers are going to devour it. 


Q: What's next, and when can we expect to see it on bookshelves?!

I’m currently tackling the “what’s next?” question and as of yet haven’t settled on an answer! Whatever it ends up being, it will likely take me several years to research and write… so maybe set your calendar for 2025 (or thereabouts!).





Wednesday, January 27, 2021

Interview with Brigid Kemmerer

 


It is my great pleasure to welcome US-author Brigid Kemmerer to the blog, to chat all things writing, 'Cursebreakers', COVID and what's next ... with many thanks to her Bloomsbury publisher for orchestrating this! 


Q: Where do story ideas generally start for you? Do you first think of the character, theme, ending? Or is it just a free-fall? 

For me, it always starts with the characters. I would write about my characters going to the grocery store if I could. Before I start writing, I do need a general sense of the plot, so I’ll usually write a really loose outline so I know where I’m going. But a lot of subplots come up organically while I’m writing. 



Q: Vow is the third and final instalment in a trilogy - so I'm curious ... how long have you known that it was all going to end this way? Did you start writing book 1 knowing how book 3 would end, were there any surprises along the way...? 

Oh, I had no idea how the trilogy was going to end up. I just knew I wanted to do a “Beauty and the Beast” trope in my own way, and I was delighted when readers connected to my story so strongly. I didn’t even plan for Grey to take on as big a role as he did. It wasn’t until he showed up on the page that I realized he needed a bigger role. 



Q: Which character did fan-response make you feel the most pressure to deliver a 'Happily Ever After' for? Harper is totally beloved, Grey became a fan-favourite ... was there any one character you really got nervous wrapping it all up for? 

Grey’s story arc was definitely the most challenging, because readers have so many thoughts about him (which is amazing!!), and I never want to let anyone down. 




Q: This story may be completed, but - do you think you'll write more stories set in this realm? More fairytale adaptations, even? 

I would love to tell more stories in this universe! I fell in love with so many secondary characters that I feel like there’s a lot of room to continue the stories. 



Q: I have to ask; do you have any particular interest in trying to tackle a story of COVID-19 in the future ...? Which I also realise is strange to ask, because long before the pandemic; you were writing this story of a curse that locks somebody in their home (okay - castle, but still!) and Prince Rhen is determined to keep himself hidden away to save *other people*. Grey meanwhile, has magic that people are wary of trusting even though it can literally heal them ... do you think fairytales and fantasy can better communicate the trials of these strange times, more so than contemporary? 

What’s especially ironic about this question is that my book Defy the Night, which comes out in September of 2021, deals with a kingdom on the brink of revolution, partly due to a mysterious illness that’s afflicting a large portion of society, and there’s not enough medicine to go around. I finished the first draft in mid-2019, well before anyone had heard of COVID-19, so it’s amazing how much art can imitate life. I do think there’s something very powerful about fiction that makes overwhelming events more accessible … especially when you see characters overcoming insurmountable challenges. 




Q: You're a YA author who has switched genres rather seamlessly - writing paranormal romances, gothic fairytales, and compelling and heartbreaking contemporary YA stories too ... how was it when you first made that genre-transition? And is it a case now of - you're hoping to switch it up every book/series, or can you only follow where an idea leads you? 

This is a great question! I think because I always start with character that it’s been easy to switch genres, because I just love the people, and complex friendships and complicated families are going to fill the pages of any book I write. For authors who want to be able to write in multiple genres, I always recommend building a base in one genre (4-5 books), so that readers learn to trust what you write, and then they’ll be more willing to take a chance on something they’re not sure they’ll like. I’ve had so many people say they only tried my fantasy because they loved my contemporary, and vice versa. For the near future, I only have fantasy on tap, but I do love contemporary and paranormal romance, too! 




Q: What was your favourite bit of fairytale trivia you discovered while researching/getting inspired for your own writing? 

I’m not sure if favorite is the right word, but when I was reading up on “Beauty and the Beast,” I remember reading that it wasn’t really about falling in love with someone’s true spirit, and instead was supposed to be a story to comfort young brides who first met their husband on their wedding night, and they were afraid. Yikes. 

Q: What are you working on right now, and when can we expect it to hit bookshelves? 

Right now, I’m working on a secret project, so stay tuned for details! But readers can look forward to Defy the Night in September 2021. 




Q: Favourite author(s) and book(s) of all time? 

Oh my goodness, I could never answer this one. I will say that Christopher Pike is the first YA author I discovered as a child, and once I started reading his books, I thought, “I want to do this.” 

Q: What are you reading, loving and recommending right now? (I'll also take watching/listening if you've been on more of a TV and podcast binge!) 

I just finished watching Bridgerton, and I loved it! 

Q: No. 1 piece of advice for emerging writers? 

Read widely! Read books by people who don’t look like you, think like you, or write like you. Stay curious about experiences that you don’t expect.







Monday, December 5, 2016

Interview with Cecelia Ahern, author of 'Lyrebird'


Hello Darling Readers,

I’m thrilled to bring you a very special Q&A on the blog today – with Irish author Cecelia Ahern! 
She’s the author of bestselling book (turned into tearjerker movie) P.S. I Love You, and another favourite book and film adaptation of mine – Love, Rosie.
She’s also responsible for one of my favourite (much-missed!) comedy shows, Samantha Who?
Cecelia Ahern’s latest book is Lyrebird, which I’m reading now and absolutely loving! 
So without further ado, here’s a special December treat for you …

***

Q:    Earlier this year you totally switched things up and released your first young adult debut in Flawed. What made you want to write for teens? And how was it harder/easier than writing for adults? 

The story decided it for me. While I’d been asked for years if I would write for Young adults, my response was, ‘I will if I get the idea’. I’m not the kind of writer who decides a genre first, I really follow the ideas. When Flawed came into my mind the first and only character that arrived with the story was 17 year old Celestine North. I think because it’s from the perspective of a teen, then that changed the audience.

However, while I’m so happy to find a new audience, I do think that it is a story for everybody, and people who enjoy my regular adult novels would also identify with this story. I didn’t have to change anything about the way that I write, that all happened naturally when I was writing the story from Celestine’s perspective.

This story came faster than any other novel I’ve ever written. I wrote the first draft in 6 weeks, I couldn’t stop writing until I was finished. I wrote it with my heart pounding, it was a thrilling experience and I think it comes across in the read, it’s pacier than my other novels.


Q:    Your books wriggle their way into reader's hearts, and we find it really hard to let go of characters after the last page - which characters do you most get asked about by fans wanting to know What Happened Next? ... And of all your backlist books, which one would you most likely return to for a sequel?

Flawed is part one of a sequel so that natural and obvious answer to that question is that Perfect will be published in April 2017.  However, I do have a sequel idea for PS I Love You, I’m just in two minds about whether writing it is the best decision.


Q:    Your latest book Lyrebird has lovely Australian connections - what inspired this book, and what sort of research did you do for it? 

I was inspired by a David Attenborough documentary which featured the superb Lyrebird. I watched this little creature with fascination as it built a mound for itself on the forest floor and proceeded to mimic every sound around it, not just the sound of other birds, but of mobile phones, car alarms, a camera shutter, and forest construction vehicles. I thought it was extraordinary and it stayed with me, I filed it away in my memory bank.

It was when I was telling my daughter about the bird, and I showed her the clip, that we both started trying to mimic the sounds the Lyrebird was making. I had a light bulb moment where I wanted to tell the story about a woman who had the abilities of a lyrebird. How would society treat her? How and why could she have this ability?

In terms of the writing, it was a challenge for me because it’s a book about sound, and it’s interesting to write about sound – but the thing that attracted me to the story the most was building a character on the traits of a bird. Laura is the physical manifestation of a bird.


Q:    What is your favourite bit of writing advice you’ve ever received?

My mother’s advice to me was to show my first few chapters of PS I Love You to an agent. I did because of her encouragement and thanks to her my career was born.

Q:  What is the worst piece of writing advice you ever received?

Another author preached to me on the importance of always trying to be better than anyone else, the importance of being number 1 in the charts, and I thought that was the biggest load of crap I’d ever heard.


Q:    What is the number one piece of life advice you would give your teen-self?

It’s all going to be okay. It will work out in the end.

Q:    Is there anything that you’d like to write about, but you haven’t been able to tackle yet?

I love murder mysteries, old fashioned ones like Murder She Wrote and Colombo. I would love to write something like that but give it my own modern, emotional twist.


Q:     The cover of Lyrebird is absolutely stunning - why do you think readers still so attached to books as objects? (even in the digital age?)

I think that when people have an emotional connection to something, to anything, then they form an attachment. Books, stories, can draw people in and invite them into another world. Reading is escapism, therapy, entertainment, it can be a very personal experience.


Q:     Two of your books have been turned into films - P.S. I Love You and Love, Rosie - and you created a critically-acclaimed television series called Samantha Who? ... I'm curious: how has working in film and TV changed the way you write? How has the way you approach writing a book changed over the years?

-->
When I write a novel, I’m always writing it as a novel, not as a future film, but I do have a visual mind so I watch the story in my head and then I write it. I think that’s why film studios have found them attractive to adapt – however writing for film is a very different craft and medium so if you write a novel, as you would a film, then it doesn’t work. Novels dig deeper, can be more introspective, and you can stay in a character’s mind for far longer. Novels are not just about plot – films need plot to constantly move them along.

*** 

Cecelia Ahern’s Lyrebird is published by HarperCollins Australia and available now.

Monday, September 5, 2016

Interview with Laura Elizabeth Woollett, author of 'The Love of a Bad Man'


Q: Tell me about how you got published (agent or slush pile)?

Neither, actually. I have an American agent who tried selling it over there in early 2015, but the general response was, “great idea, but we’re not doing short stories right now,” and, “tell us when she has a novel.” I ended up going to the US mid-2015 to research my next novel. A couple of months after my return, I did a reading for a Melbourne Writers Festival event and Marika Webb-Pullman, a commissioning editor from Scribe, happened to be in the audience. The next morning, she emailed me asking to see what I was working on, and I had a two-book deal within a month. 


Q: How long did it take you to write ‘The Love of a Bad Man’ - from first idea to final manuscript? 

In 2012, I finished my degree and my first novel, The Wood of Suicides. After that, I had a bit of a fallow period, writing-wise, but was reading more nonfiction, looking for ideas. I think I was committed to the idea of the collection by early 2013 and I wrote a few of the stories that year. In 2014, I got a Wheeler Centre Hot Desk Fellowship and completed a big chunk of the book over ten weeks. By the end of 2014, I had a final manuscript. So about two years, all up.

 

Q: Where do story ideas generally start for you? Do you first think of the character, theme, ending? Or is it just a free-fall?

I honestly don’t have that many ideas. There are themes that I find myself coming back to (girlhood, sex, power) again and again, and my stories tend to be ways of exploring these, with shifts in character, setting, and perspective. Sometimes a random image or detail will spark something in me, but it’s rare that it leads to a whole story. With this collection, I was very dependent on research to supplement my imagination, and I think this is how I work best: research-heavy fiction. I envy those writers who are idea-machines, capable of spinning totally original stories from the tiniest inspiration. I personally need a lot of groundwork.


Q: Are you a ‘plotter’ or a ‘pantser’ - that is, do you meticulously plot your novel before writing, or do you ‘fly by the seat of your pants’ and let the story evolve naturally?

Plotter all the way – as you probably guessed from my previous response. My Myers-Briggs type is INTJ, aka ‘the Mastermind’. I like to mastermind things, to think them through meticulously before I put them to paper. For this reason, I love research, and always hated those 10-minute creative writing exercises at uni (mostly I’d just draw flowers or fashion girls instead of writing anything).


Q: How did you go about choosing these particular women to focus on - and were you already familiar with all their stories, or once you had the concept for the collection did you have to go digging through the history books for a cast of characters? 

There were some that I encountered in my teens. I remember reading about the kidnapping of Elizabeth Smart in DOLLY, of all places, when I was 13 or 14. Others I heard of in my early twenties and filed away with the intention of reading up on, though not necessarily writing about. And others I actively sought out, once I realised I had a collection on my hands. There were several cases I read up on but didn’t end up including. Twelve stories seemed like a good amount to explore the theme multifariously, without it being overkill.  



Q: Even though you are writing fictional accounts of these women's lives, you have some meticulous details in here - particularly around historical context. What kind of research did you do, not only for accurate details but to also get into the head-space of some really unsavoury characters? 

I read a lot of true crime and biographies, to start with. The facts that I connected with most tended to be mundane things, rather than gory details; stuff like what these characters wore, ate, watched, read, smoked, etc. Picturing the dailiness of their lives helped me see them as real people, with habits and preferences, and made it easier to get under their skin. In terms of ‘darker’ impulses, that involved more introspection. I don’t think there’s anything particularly mysterious about the feelings that motivate bad behaviour; the invisible lines between feeling and action are where the mystery lies, for me. So often it was a matter of taking a feeling I’ve had and following that thread.  


Q: What was your favourite bit of trivia you discovered while researching? 

Ian Brady gave Myra Hindley a record to commemorate each murder they committed together. The first record was ‘Theme from The Legion’s Last Patrol’ by Ken Thorne and His Orchestra. The rest were pop songs, and all about breakups or being stood up: ‘24 Hours From Tulsa’ by Gene Pitney, ‘It’s Over’ by Roy Orbison, ‘Girl Don’t Come’ by Sandie Shaw, and Joan Baez’s ‘It’s All Over Now, Baby Blue’. No happy love songs.



Q: Do any of the real women in the collection know that you've written about them? A few are still alive, after all (Veronica Compton, Caril Ann Fugate)

I didn’t try to contact any of them. It was easier for me not to, and seemed like the safest, least intrusive option. Of the women still alive, many have taken pains to live anonymously. Others are still serving time. I did track down one of them online, though decided against getting in touch. Ultimately, I’m a fiction writer, not a journalist, and didn’t feel like such contact was necessary to the composition of these stories.  


Q: What's the hardest part of short-story writing for you? 

Ideas!


Q: What are you working on right now, and when can we expect it to his bookshelves?

I’m working on a (long!) novel called Beautiful Revolutionary. It’s about a young couple who join Jim Jones’ Peoples Temple in late ’60s California, and follows them all the way to the Jonestown massacre of 1978. It actually began with research for this book, and about one woman in particular, Carolyn Moore Layton, who was Jones’ mistress and most trusted aide. I didn’t end up including a story about her – partly because her character didn’t lend itself well to first-person narration, partly because I felt I needed a whole novel to get her character right – though she does cameo in ‘Marceline’. It’ll hit bookshelves sometime in 2018, which is also the 40th anniversary of the Jonestown massacre.


Q: Favourite author(s) and book(s) of all time?

Lolita. The Bell Jar. The Virgin Suicides. The Secret History. And the Ass Saw the Angel. Bonjour Tristesse. The Beach. Joyce Carol Oates. Marguerite Duras. Elena Ferrante. Gillian Flynn. Stephanie Dickinson.  

Q: What are you reading, loving and recommending right now?

I’ve just finished Carthage by Joyce Carol Oates. It’s my first JCO of the year and one of the most recent books (2014) from her super-massive backlist. A Goodreads reviewer described it as “an arthouse redux of Gone Girl”, and there are some similarities, though this is much more bizarre and existential. I saw a lot of myself in the protagonist, Cressida Mayfield – which is a little scary because she’s an incredibly high-strung, antisocial, self-sabotaging character!

I’ve also been reading White Girls by Hilton Als, a writer for The New Yorker. It’s an exploration of Als’ identification, as a gay African-American man, with ‘white girls’ of culture. More broadly, it’s an exploration of gender, race, class, and art. His writing is both intimate and critical, with long, fancy sentences that I love.

Haven’t started yet, but dying to read The Turner House by Angela Flourney. She’s a debut author from the US and a guest of Melbourne Writers Festival this year. It’s a family saga set in Detroit, and the snippets I’ve read on Amazon have been fantastic.    


Q: Do you have any advice for budding young writers?

I think it’s important to know your strengths and weaknesses, and to find a style that suits them, without being fatalistic about it. For instance, I always thought I was terrible at dialogue, then suddenly I wasn’t. Read writers whose strengths you share and see how they do it. Read writers whose strengths you don’t share for the same reason. Know that, no matter where you’re starting from, you can only get better and better.


| More